Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00920
Original file (BC 2014 00920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00920
			COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His name, as reflected on his DD Form 214, Report of Separation 
from Active Duty, be corrected from “ to 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) made him aware his name 
was incorrect.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on       
23 May 73 and served on active duty until he was honorably 
discharged on 22 May 77.

The  applicant subsequently served in the Tennessee Air National 
Guard from 7 Mar 81 until 17 Feb 84, when he was honorably 
discharged.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  Air Force Instruction 36-2608, 
Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.3, Note 5 states “Do 
not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the 
name used while serving with the Air Force was erroneously 
recorded.”  A review of the applicant’s records revealed that he 
enlisted, served, and was released from Active Duty under the 
name of “.”  An Air Force Form 281, Notification 
of Change in Service Member’s Official Records, dated 25 Jun 85, 
was found in the applicant’s record but this change did not take 
effect until well after the applicant was released from Active 
duty on 22 May 77 and while the applicant was serving as a 
Reserve member.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIRP evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 28 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
While a review of the applicant’s records revealed an official 
name change request, said request was initiated after the 
applicant was discharged from the Air National Guard and when he 
no was no longer affiliated with the military service, as an 
active, reserve, or retired member.  Therefore, in view of the 
fact that AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table 
A7.3, Note 5 indicates that records of former members should not 
be corrected unless evidence proves the name used was 
erroneously recorded while serving with the Air Force, we find 
no basis to conclude the applicant is the victim of an error or 
injustice and therefore find no basis to recommend granting the 
requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00920 in Executive Session on 22 Jan 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00920 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIRP, dated 20 Mar 014.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02204

    Original file (BC 2014 02204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02204 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be amended to reflect her married name. The applicant provides no rationale as to why the Board should consider her untimely application in the interest of justice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00432

    Original file (BC 2014 00432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, any such name change should be limited only to the DD Form 214; any change to an applicant's other records to reflect a post-service name change should rarely be recommended, and only in the most unusual cases. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00506

    Original file (BC 2014 00506.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Board did take into consideration SAF/MR’s memorandum, dated 9 Mar 15, Guidance To The Air Force Board For Correction oF Military Records (AFBCMR) – Name Changes; however, we determined...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03449

    Original file (BC 2014 03449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03449 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect her maiden name. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00994

    Original file (BC 2014 00994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00994 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military records be corrected to reflect his legally changed name. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He legally changed his name after he was discharged from the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03631

    Original file (BC 2013 03631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIRP states Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.3, Note 5 states “Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the name used while serving with the Air Force was erroneously recorded.” The applicant’s dates of service are from 9 August 1949 through 20 August 1951. As the documentation of the applicant’s name change is dated after their period of service, it does not appear the Air Force erroneously recorded the applicant’s name. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00588

    Original file (BC 2014 00588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00588 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His name of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be changed. Air Force Instruction 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, Table A7.3, Note 5 states “Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the name used...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02838

    Original file (BC 2014 02838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the court order provided by the applicant, dated 15 Jan 13, his legal name has been changed to On 24 Mar 15, the applicant was forwarded a copy of the SAF/MR memorandum, dated 9 Mar 15, that was provided in order to comply with 10 U.S.C. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00242

    Original file (BC 2014 00242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2608, Military Personnel Record System, Tab A7.5, Correction of DOB, Note 3 reads “Do not correct records of former members unless evidence proves the date of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01022

    Original file (BC 2014 01022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The absence of any original or a certified copy of the legal supporting documentation is not sufficient to evaluate whether the date was recorded in error. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIRP,...